Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Introduction: Present Huanggang

Huanggang is known as one of the urban villages in Shenzhen with a solid development planning and urban modernization located in Futian district close to the border of Hongkong. Nowadays, Huanggang is a self-governing village authorized by the local government as a land for migrant laborers. The population has grown to the maximum density along with the rapid development of its urbanization since 1990s. The village also presents as a hybrid community through a combination of developed and undeveloped areas with more potential in growths of economics, community, and environment. Throughout the past decades, the idea of “Collectivism” is concerned as one of the significant factors and characteristics of Huanggang’s growth. It emphasizes the idea of “home” visually through the relationship between the local government and individuals. For this reason, the project intends to manifest the possible ideal of Huanggang in the future in which it maintains the original characteristics through the collaboration between Village Company (Local Government), Young Generation (Developers), Investors (Corporations), and Villagers (community), starting from a large scale of urbanity to an individual unit.





Hypothesis

Huanggang village is predictively proposed to be “a developed village presented in a form of a strong utopian community maintaining the village’s main characteristics of collectivism.” Regarding the idea of sustainability, this collective community can be established with the balance of social, economics, and environment although the village’s urbanization changes through time. Huanggang village’s original context basically presents with a high potential of future development. By analysis through the role of the local government towards the idea of sustainability in order to create the possible conclusion for the future development, the following policies are introduced as the approaches for the future village:

     • Create a positive propaganda to change the villager’s perspective in order to gain support in the idea of redevelopment or development of the original urban village.

     • Promote the village’s value to both local and external investors to support the development in service and amenities for community.
                 
     • Promote the village’s environment as the investing factors to gain funds for services and amenities improvement

     • Provide new employment for migrants in other cities to promote increasing number of population and to be able to set the standard of working payment

     • Organize both private and public areas to provide the most suitable and beneficial to every class of inhabitants.


These approaches initially present through the top down design of architecture. The new village planning is introduced as an ideal form of urbanization from the government’s interest propagating to the community. This new blueprint for the future development is created considering through the reorganization of land uses and pedestrian system in order to enhance economics, society, and environment. The new village planning, as a result, presents the dynamic process of what can be possible developed in order to maintain collectivism along with the improvement of the village’s sustainability.


Argument: Huanggang Observation
Sense of collectivism – Huanggang social relationship

The observation in Huanggang village is used as an argument to prove the idea of collectivism. These photographs emphasize the sense of collectivism through different social relationships of each character within the village.

Photograph 1: Combination of old and new (Present vs. Future)


- Huanggang is an experimental typology of urbanization. The coexistence between old areas with dense organisation of handshake buildings and new developed areas with modern high-rise buildings both manifest collectivism through the corporatisation of village development as well as the synergy between its communities. The village also represents innovative development, portraying the trace of transition between present and future.


Photograph 2: Individual interaction (People vs. People à Collectivism Vs. Individualism)             


- To live in Huanggang is to live in a collective community amongst its people. The idea of individuality clearly portrays throughout the dense area of the village. The surrounding of handshake buildings is concerned as the main subject for creating the ability of a strong human interaction. The individual activities, therefore, are not being excluded from the society, but being interactive with pass-by people in the neighborhood throughout the architectural influence. The girl sitting on the motorcycle represents the individuality among the public space. The pass-by observant, a person whom was taking her photograph, represents another individuality that literally caused an interaction with the girl when she turned to look at what the observant was doing. The individual observation between each other immediately existed in the middle of the handshake building’s alley. The space eventually causes collectivism through the interaction and relationship between individuals.

-        
Photograph 3: Social Mechanism (People + Activities vs. Space)

- Common spaces are promoted by the government throughout the area of Huanggang in order to present the idea of community and unified society. These spaces are occupied by groups of people with various ages and activities, performing the concept of sharing and interaction. The result turns out to the impact of collectivism portrayed how people live and perceive each other. These common spaces allow exchanges between people in which they learn, share, experience, and spend time together. The villagers use these spaces to perceive similar perspective in collective activities, while different perception is given to the observant, feeling as an outsider, who questions towards different behaviors and unexpected uses within the space.



Photograph 4: Collective Instrument (People Vs. Government: Corporatisation and Power)

- Huanggang’s local government takes the main authority of the village’s control in form of a company. The power is used positively as the instrument from both government and corporations to enhance collectivism and sustainability within the community. These instruments are operated by the government and corporations in order to provide better living condition and social environment to the village. The idea of political control is, therefore, transmitted to different layers of observations and practices, starting respectively from provided infrastructure, amenities, and personnel. By observing along the village for safety, the soldier is one of the representatives of this leadership power and political observant who is taking responsibility for the security operation of the village. The relationship between people and the government, consequently, exists through these instruments in which they enhance collectivism. 

 

Photograph 5: Life under the observation (People Vs. Political framework à Proximity and Privacy)

- Life in Huanggang is the consequence of an observation under the political framework. CCTV network is currently used as the technological power of the government to organize and enhance the community in collective notion. This results in how people’s awareness of being observed is raised, while the collective protection is constantly provided. Referring to the main objective of the local government, the operation of this political framework takes the main role of providing the relationship between the government’s control and people, aiming to maintain the notion of collectivism and sustainability within the village. The idea of CCTV network will be further developed into a better infrastructure which proposes more than the concept of security. Besides, it will facilitate as the collective instrument that reframes proximity between the government and people, allowing the flexibility of having their own privacy under the given security.